ii 1886 - it was ai
certe
certainly strongly
recommended by
me when
Aching Captains Superintendent in 1889. sape Dempster though residing at
Kowloon could never take the - morning reports there - he had to Gv
to his office, and c
every petty offence in the Dorice on the Lowloon side had to be settled at Police Head Quarters, offenders and - witnesses having to come over for investigation. The Adjutant could.
never take wro
marning reports and correspondence of Police Stead Quarters to crable the Captain Superintendent to visit out stations - his office
Paymaster prevented him-
duties as
be was unable even sometimes to
attend parades and muske
musketry drills in the afternoons, and men coming from outstations for nuusketry had someteries to return without being
able to fire their rounds. Not only
ari
751
inconvenerice to the men but an extra expense to Governmen for transport. These are only a few -particulars of the inconvenerices officer serving
resulting from an under the Captains Supermitendent haveing
other and
in his
cijev
Fo
important duties to attend to, which Police requirements had to give way. Happily, as I believe, this dual appointment.
was abolished
and
a
Deputy Supermitendent
appointed in his place
14 July 1890.
مكم
cza
probation
For the above reasons.
I am of opinion that the appoint_
ment of
officer as Supernitendent
at
of Water Police, who has other duties to perform under another Chief, -
would not be conducive to uncrcased:
efficiency in the Police but rather
The reverse.
I would desire to add
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.